Language Unknown
The insofar
Again, I don't have this close proximity to the language, and I just can't take these matters of embodied performance seriously. Not because they don't matter, or I don't care....rather there is this progression that I've taken notice too, and I think a lot does have to do with the fact that I'm very much an isolated existence for the most part. And I can't say that it's this notion of deficited isolation, in the sense that I suffer. Rather, there is this intrigue with the way in which we exist that holds my attention. I think people invest who they are into their language, even in regards to faiths, or distopias or utopias of some alternative form. It's this idea that there is this notion of truth, this notion of what is real, as opposed to this notion of what is consistent. That is, instead of acknowledging that there isn't a categorical to nest categories in, there isn't this universal known in regards to the emergence of the categorical splitting necessary to initiate the language, of these expressions involving both dialectic and non-dialectic explaination; there is this assumption that to split the category is to know. To split the body and the spirit, to split the observation and the feel, to split hear from taste....there is this notion that one knows, rather than there is consistency. That there is some absolute foundation rather than an emergent probability, and this isn't a minor issue, as how we understand the way in which we exist changes greatly when one acknowledges the issues with categorical splitting, with a language unknown, as there is an insofar. And oftentimes I will say language insofar, but that doesn't really address the matter, in the way that insofar does. Where insofar would be this necessary condition for the categorical splitting to emerge. That is there is a nesting, that is inherent simply by our design of splitting the categories. We are bound, but that is of the categorical splitting, the insofar is the necessary condition necessary for such assertions. And this isn't some meditative or nihilistic notion either, as my approach is actionable. Meaning, that the informatic model isn't about the categorical split, but rather the relational design of the vector space arrangements, of the dimension of the language, that references and demonstrates that the categorical split isn't an absolute manifestation but rather of a series of possibilities including the insofar. The informatic arrangement expresses this, in a useful manner. That is, there is a consistent focus in how the design emerges, that is something beyond the splits, yet accounting for the splits. There is this way of communication that articulates that communication isn't actually of ourselves, but rather of something much more intelligent that is well beyond our own egos, well beyond our own control. And I think for me, even as I go about life, there isn't this need for conventional frames, and there isn't much use either. It's just not useful in understanding how one can exist differently. To do that you have to crack the conventional crust, switch things up as fast as you can, suddenly and abruptly, to take not of the experiences, the assumptions of those experiences, and take not of how one relates to their language, and play with that relationship. And for me, the relationship is a strange one at this point, in that I can say a lot, but I am not even convinced of any of these sayings, not because I am so much lost, but rather, I am curious in how the language exist in a different way, in a more authentic way to our own existence. And the fascinating matter to me, is work, these service jobs, attempt to tie the language to the experience in an inauthentic way. To communicate, and indeed there is a need for communication, but to communicate not only a physical embodied need, but to communicate matters that are not an embodied need. To attempt to exchange language a something foundational and concrete. As something that truly does embed an authentic existence, but that cannot be, as the insofar remains. And it's this insofar that must be acknowledge for one to understand how they authentically exist, that their relationship with language as they know it today is a lie. It isn't real, and how they think they know themselves is fake. The simply do not exist in that way, and the informatic relation articulates this. Where yes I communicate with this static, 1 dimensional, universal ordering, that has been the dominate way of thinking because of the static mediums being utilized, but that static medium has transformed into a dynamic medium, that allows a greater development in how we relate to this language. All in all, I think the process can drive one nuts, considering there is this push to familiarize and assert a specific type of relationship with the language. To break away as an adult can be difficult and there can be this cold stigmatizing experience, as if you have become alien even to yourself, but everything improves, at least matters are for me. I'm starting to simply go along with language to fit in as we are trained to do at a very young age, while sustaining a great distance to the language. I am able to profess things about who I am, without being convinced of any of it, and yet, not feeling nihilistic at all, considering there is a constructive approach in these matters, as the informatic language is being modeled, these arrangements that were not actually traced, nor were ever attempts at such a methodology until today. And it's a train-wreck at times. The categorical language ingrained, is a difficult process to break, and stabilizing relations can be difficult, meaning, you become this alien of a culture, this stranger in a strange land when you do break the existing, and I assert outdated traditions. If everyone were on the same page though, it would be different, as what is being communicated isn't a universal but rather a basis for the emergent models of the informatic, as we are activity, of the insofar. We are not simply isolated containers without embed. There is more relation to our language other than the categorical, and universal ordering. There is a spacial consistency of the language that thanks to computation can be presented, and challenges the existing assumption that language can only be understood in one particular way. That's just not the case, and there is plenty of pragmatic activity to demonstrate otherwise.
[For informatic production]
