These Anecdotes
They never line up
Just going through various biographies especially in regards to certain individuals, of my design, who have experienced the bigotries of an elite group, of certain up close and personal interactions...they like their anecdotes, and not in a direct way but in an indirect way. That is, they like to enlist the people who like their honey pot to interact with that of which requires to be on paper, to be of anecdote, and have those report back. The exchange, the crafting, the racialized characterization, delivers a great deal of power to the, at least when that type of power never falls into question. That is, the basis of cosmetic authority isn't challenged....and bad habits are hard to break. That paper is all too tempting, of that isolated event, that adds to what needs to be characterized. Problem is, when you are living, at least in the remnants of a free country, there is a very long officious history of the individual, as well as a clean record....so something doesn't make sense. And that's just the inherent failures of anecdote. And my favorite too by this network is the reversal, of oh, he was out of favor but now we want him, let's pick and choose the positives and now craft him into something else. It's amusing to observe, but it's intolerable to one who is rational, reasoning insofar as itself, just as human as the next. I did not come out of the womb to be endorsed or disproved of on some irrational basis, of the racialized characterization. I'm not here to acquiesced into a subhuman species, especially considering when you are a citizen of what is supposed to be a democratic country, there are certain things you do not tolerate, and you do indeed, speak up for them. There is a rational constituency in this country, though the push to hollow out the democratic inner-workings of these institutions and transform the nation into a hollowed out subject-ship , a return to the plantation, with a more diverse styling, of like-minded owners with international and cosmopolitan flare. To reinvent what the American will be, not of rational constituency, but of your choice of embodied performance, to the left, a humanism fit for the royal family of Britain, to the Right, a kleptocracy for for the greatest of dictators, like that of Russia. We've come so far haven't we! But even as all of this is playing out everywhere, the anecdotes will have many, many, problems, as this racializing and fictitional arrangement remains cherry-picked and as always grounded not on the basis of what is consistent, but on the basis of one particular event that plays into some not so forthright desires. And by design, that characterization always manages to deface itself with inconsistencies of official records and performance, to which heads turn to understand more on why is there this desire for the anecdote. What is happening here? And it never ends well for those who just love their Rome. Of a design that prefers a nation of caste systems and subject-ship, rather than citizens. A design that has very little to do with America, though those who carry out this need for the Anecdote, do love to fly American flags and wrap themselves into a national display of absolutely nothing...no mean, no love, just an opportunity to gut out what is so inconvenient to them.
[For informatic production]
